The court pointed out that the language used in the legislation makes it clear that the word ‘relative’ would not include a woman with whom a man has had sexual relations outside of the marriage.
“By no stretch of imagination, a girlfriend or even a woman who maintains sexual relations with a man outside of marriage in an etymological sense would be a ‘relative’. The word ‘relative’ brings within its purview a status. Such status must be conferred either by blood or marriage, or adoption. If no marriage has taken place, the question of one being relative of another would not arise,” read the Court order.
The order was passed on a petition moved by a woman who was charged under Section 498A of the IPC.
She sought an order from the court quashing the proceedings pending against her before a magistrate court.
The case against her was registered on a complaint filed by her live-in partner’s wife.
Her partner and his wife had a strained marriage and the wife’s complaint accused him, his mother, his brother, and the petitioner of subjecting her to cruelty.
The petitioner argued that her relationship with her partner does not make her his relative as contemplated under Section 498A.
The court concurred with the argument and proceeded to quash the proceedings against her.
“These being the facts, I am of the opinion that there will not be a question of prosecution against the petitioner under Section 498-A of IPC. The FIR and the Final Report as against the petitioner shall stand quashed,” the judge said in the order.
–Ajit Weekly News
sg/sha
News Credits – I A N S
