Judiciary cannot be controlled, directly or indirectly, by the legislature or the executive, or else the ‘rule of law’ would become illusory, Chief Justice of India N V Ramana asserted on Wednesday and at the same time cautioned judges against being swayed by social media.
IMAGE: Chief Justice of India Justice NV Ramana at Sri Venkateswara Swamy temple in Tirupati. Photograph: ANI Photo
“The new media tools that have an enormous amplifying ability are incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong, good and bad and the real and fake. Therefore, media trials cannot be a guiding factor in deciding cases,” the CJI said, adding it is also imperative to start a discourse as to how social media trends can affect the institutions.
CJI Ramana made the observations while delivering the ’17th Justice P. D. Desai Memorial Lecture’.
“For the judiciary to apply checks on governmental power and action, it has to have complete freedom. The judiciary cannot be controlled, directly or indirectly, by the legislature or the executive, or else the rule of law would become illusory.
“At the same time, judges should not be swayed by the emotional pitch of public opinion either, which is getting amplified through social media platforms,” the CJI said.
He added that the judges have to be mindful of the fact that the noise thus amplified is not necessarily reflective of what is right.
“It is therefore extremely vital to function independently and withstand all external aids and pressures.
“While there is a lot discussion about the pressure from the executive, it is also imperative to start a discourse as to how social media trends can affect the institutions,” he added.
Noting the “unprecedented crisis” being faced by the entire world due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CJI said, “We necessarily have to pause and ask ourselves as to what extent we have used the ‘rule of
law’ to ensure protection to and welfare of all of our people.”
“I began to feel that this pandemic might yet be a mere curtain-raiser to much larger crises in the decades to come. Surely we must at least begin the process of analysing what we did right and where we went
wrong,” he said.
The CJI added that in a democratic country like India, access to justice forms the bedrock of the “rule of law” and urged all to extend a helping hand to those in need.
“However, this guarantee of equal justice will be rendered meaningless if the vulnerable sections are unable to enjoy their rights because of their poverty or illiteracy or any other kind of weakness,” he said.
He said that gender equality is very important and legal empowerment of women not only enables them to advocate for their rights and needs in society but also increases their visibility in the legal reform process and allows their participation in it.
“Bias and prejudice necessarily lead to injustice, particularly when it relates to the minorities,” he added.
The CJI said that any law backed by a sovereign must be tempered by certain ideals or tenets of justice. Only a State that is governed by such law, can be said to have the “Rule of Law”.
“I would urge both young and senior counsel to extend a helping hand to those in need of justice… Let economy, gender, class or caste never be a hindrance in the path to secure justice,” he said, emphasising
the need to extend ease of access to justice.
“Only when the citizens believe that they have fair and equal access to justice, can we have sustainable, just, inclusive and peaceful societies.
“Citizens can strengthen the “Rule of Law” by being knowledgeable about it and by applying it to their daily conduct and pushing for justice when needed,” he said.